Guy Den Ouden vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In terms of second serve performance over the past six months, Ouden has shown a slightly better success rate, securing 43.35% of points compared to Zandschulp’s 41.52%.
• When it comes to return games, Ouden again has a marginal edge, winning 46.23% of opponent's second serve points, surpassing Zandschulp's 45.51%.
• Zandschulp shows strength in first serve returns, capturing 27.48% of points compared to Ouden’s 29.49%.
• Who performs better under pressure? Zandschulp, with a 51.67% success rate in saving breakpoints, edges past Ouden who manages to save 48.31%.
• Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Ouden leads with a win rate of 68.42%, outperforming Zandschulp’s 49.18%.
• On indoor hard courts, Zandschulp shines with a 63% win rate, whereas Ouden's strengths are on clay with a 70% success rate.
• Event level exposure varies; Zandschulp has mostly competed at the Main tour level, achieving a 48.39% win rate, while Ouden has excelled in Challenger/ITF tournaments at 68.63%.
• Does the quality of opponents matter? Zandschulp has faced tougher competition, with opponents ranked on average at 141.08, compared to Ouden's average opponent rank of 333.91.
• In deciding sets, Ouden appears more clutch, winning 48% of such sets, compared to Zandschulp’s 39%.
• Finally, Ouden edges out in breakpoint conversion, successfully taking 36.61% of opportunities, whereas Zandschulp has a 32.29% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (August 2, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performances and statistics of both players offers a competitive outlook for the upcoming match.

Ouden displays a slight advantage in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, which could be pivotal in critical moments.

Despite Zandschulp’s advantage in higher-level competition and first serve returns, the consistent overall form of Ouden, illustrated by a higher match win percentage and deciding set performance, is noteworthy.

However, the discrepancy in opponent quality faced by Zandschulp suggests the potential for unpredictability.

Ouden’s consistent strengths across various areas, despite less challenging competition, may give them the upper hand in this encounter.

Considering all factors, Ouden is favored to win the upcoming tennis match, albeit by a narrow margin.